Author Archives: admin

Summary of the appearance/parameters of the entire iPhone 17 series

On June 5, the iPhone 17 series is about to enter the production stage. At present, the revelations of all parties regarding the new machine have basically converged and are becoming more and more complete.

Blogger Apple Hub summarizes the appearance and configuration of the entire iPhone 17 series, so that everyone can intuitively understand the specifications and differences of the four models this time.

The current product sequence has been confirmed, namely: iPhone 17 Air, iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro, iPhone 17 Pro Max.

The previous Plus model has been removed, and the Air model has been added, focusing on an ultra-thin body. The previously exposed model is about 5.59mm thick, refreshing Apple’s historical record, and adopts a new appearance.

The iPhone 17 Pro series has undergone major changes, using a new large matrix rear camera, and the back shell adopts a splicing solution, the upper half is metal, and the lower half is glass, maintaining the wireless charging function.

The most important thing is that this time the entire iPhone 17 series will be equipped with a 120Hz high refresh screen as standard. This is the first time in Apple’s history, and the biggest shortcoming of the standard version has finally been made up.

The specific configuration is as follows:

iPhone 17

Screen: 6.1 inches

Body: aluminum + glass

Performance: A18 chip + 8GB memory

Front camera: 24 million pixel front camera

Rear camera: 48 million pixel main camera + 12 million pixel ultra-wide angle

Baseband: Qualcomm

Charging: 35W

iPhone 17 Air

Screen: 6.6 inches

Body: titanium + glass

Performance: A19 chip + 12GB memory

Front camera: 24 million pixels

Rear camera: 48 million pixel single camera

Baseband: Apple’s self-developed C1

Charging: 35W

iPhone 17 Pro

Screen: 6.3 inches

Body: aluminum + glass

Performance: A19 Pro chip + 12GB memory

Front camera: 24 million pixels

Rear camera: 48 million pixel main camera + 48 million pixel ultra-wide angle + 48 million pixel telephoto

Baseband: Qualcomm

Charging: 35W

iPhone 17 Pro Max

Screen: 6.9 inches

Body: aluminum + glass

Performance: A19 Pro chip + 12GB memory

Front camera: 24 million pixels

Rear camera: 48 million pixel main camera + 48 million pixel ultra-wide angle + 48 million pixel telephoto

Baseband: Qualcomm

Charging: 35W

Source: iPhone 17

App Store facilitated $1.3 trillion in transactions last year

On June 5, Apple cited a latest research report saying that in 2024, AppStore achieved $1.3 trillion in developer turnover and sales.

This report comes from Andrey Fradkin, an economist at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business, and Jessica Burley, an economist at Analysis Consulting International. It mainly covers three topics. In addition to the overall revenue performance of the AppStore in 2024, it also involves the growth changes of the ecosystem in the past five years, as well as the development of different regions during this period.

The report presents the most concerned set of data for the AppStore, that is, more than 90% of the above $1.3 trillion in revenue does not require any commission to Apple and belongs entirely to developers.

It should be pointed out that all the above turnover and sales include three major sectors: digital goods and services, physical goods and services, and in-app advertising. The corresponding revenues of the three are $131 billion, $1.01 trillion, and $150 billion, accounting for 10.11%, 78.3%, and 11.58% respectively.

According to Apple’s rules for collecting commissions, the platform usually only collects commissions for digital goods and services, which is about 10%. It generally includes virtual items purchased in apps (such as game skins and coins), subscription services (music, video, fitness), and digital content sales (such as online courses).

Apple may hope to use this to illustrate the contribution of the AppStore to developers and even the world economy, in order to alleviate the accusations and concerns about the “Apple tax” that have always been raised by the outside world.

“Apple tax” refers to a commission that Apple collects from developers’ in-app digital goods and service revenues. The commission rate is usually 15%-30%, depending on the developer’s annual income scale, the nature of its services, cooperation projects, subscription duration and other factors.

Starting from the dispute over Epic Games’ “Fortnite”, Apple’s disputes and lawsuits involving “Apple tax” have never stopped in the past five years, and once intensified in the middle.

Not only large developers such as Epic Games and Spotify, but also governments and regulatory agencies in many countries and regions such as the European Union, the United States, Japan, South Korea, and the Netherlands have gradually participated in the boycott of the “Apple Tax”.

The boycott is usually based on “anti-monopoly” as the reason. The accuser believes that Apple has restricted the payment methods of developers by virtue of its monopoly position and forced commissions, which may not meet the definition of free competition.

Apple’s opposition to this is also very tough. The company previously stated in a remote dialogue with Spotify that the channels, ecology and tools created by the AppStore provide convenience for developers to release products, attract traffic and make profits. Spotify has become a beneficiary of Apple in the process of market scale and product monetization, but does not want to pay Apple any fees other than developer projects.

An image processing software developer told the Jiemian News reporter that as a small and medium-sized developer, he does not think that the “Apple Tax” is unreasonable, because the small and medium-sized developer group does benefit from the development tools, review processes, payment tools provided by Apple, and the recommendation mechanism of the AppStore in acquiring users and business closed loops.

The reason for the difference in mentality between these small and medium-sized developers and large developers may be the huge gap in the amount of benefits they share. This is a long-term demand that Apple has to face from the perspective of commercial interests. From the perspective of legal supervision, Apple obviously still has a long way to go to prove itself in the face of local governments and institutions.

However, since Apple may make targeted adjustments to the commission rules in response to regulatory requirements, such as allowing external paid links in some forms (such as reader apps) or lowering the maximum commission ratio, this may cause countries and regions that do not have preferential rates to participate in this negotiation.

In any case, the above report does show that Apple AppStore, as one of the largest digital transaction carriers, provides many possibilities for economic growth and presents the trend trajectory of various sub-industries in the consumer field.

The report shows that the developer turnover and sales achieved by AppStore throughout the year increased from US$514 billion in 2019 to US$1.3 trillion in 2024.

Among them, digital goods and services revenue increased from US$63 billion to US$131 billion, physical goods and services revenue increased from US$396 billion to US$1.01 trillion, and in-app advertising revenue increased from US$65 billion to US$150 billion.

The report mentioned that the growth of physical goods and services was the strongest, reaching 2.6 times, which was mainly due to the substantial increase in food delivery and self-collection and daily necessities consumption.

From a regional perspective, the data can also provide some judgments. From 2019 to 2024, China, the United States, and Europe achieved 2.3 times, 2.8 times, and 2.9 times growth in AppStore turnover and sales, respectively.

However, according to the data in 2024, China still contributed the most revenue with US$539 billion, followed by the United States and Europe, which contributed US$406 billion and US$148 billion, respectively.

Source: iPhone 17

It is predicted that the basic model of Apple iPhone 17 will continue to use the existing A18 chip and 8GB memory

The basic model of iPhone 17 continues to use the A18 chip and 8GB memory, with limited upgrades; the Pro series is equipped with the A19 chip, the screen refresh rate is increased to 120Hz, the screen size is increased to 6.3 inches, and the cost performance is more outstanding.

According to the latest research report of Apple analyst Jeff Pu on May 31, Apple’s lowest-end iPhone 17 model this year will use the same A18 chip as the basic model of iPhone 16, and will still be built based on TSMC’s second-generation 3-nanometer process (N3E).

According to reports, the ultra-thin iPhone 17 Air/Slim is expected to be equipped with the A19 chip, while the iPhone 17 Pro series will use the A19 Pro chip, and both chips are planned to be manufactured using TSMC’s third-generation 3-nanometer process (N3P).

Pu Deyu predicts that the iPhone 17 will continue the 8GB memory of the iPhone 16. IT Home noticed that another Apple analyst, Ming-Chi Kuo, said last month that the iPhone 17 Air and two Pro models will be upgraded to 12GB of memory, and the basic version is still considering whether to have 8GB or 12GB of memory. If Pu Deyu’s information is accurate, it means that Apple has decided to continue using the 8GB solution, which will highlight the cost-effectiveness of the other three models.

Based on the existing information, the upgrade of the basic model of iPhone 17 is limited compared to iPhone 16, and the appearance design of the two is basically the same. The main upgrades rumored include: the display refresh rate is increased from 60Hz to 120Hz, and the front camera is upgraded from 12MP to 24MP.

In addition, display industry analyst Ross Young revealed that the screen size of the basic model of iPhone 17 will be slightly increased to 6.3 inches (iPhone 16 is 6.1 inches). According to Apple’s product release practice, the iPhone 17 series is expected to debut in September this year, so stay tuned.

Source: iPhone 17

Apple urgently ships iPhones to the US

According to Indian media Times of India, citing senior Apple executives, in order to minimize the impact of rising costs caused by tariffs, Apple chose to urgently ship Apple mobile phone products from India to the United States before the new tariff policy of the US government came into effect.

According to reports, at the end of March, Apple arranged 5 planes in just 3 days, fully loaded with Apple mobile phones and other products from India to the United States. Analysts pointed out that if Apple chooses to completely pass on the costs brought by tariffs to consumers, the price of Apple mobile phones is expected to increase by 30% to 40%.

Analysts believe that Apple may increase product prices, otherwise the company’s earnings per share may fall by 15%.

source: Apple JP

EU finds “TikTok in violation”

On May 15, the European Commission, the executive body of the European Union (EU), put forward a provisional opinion that the short video app “TikTok” violated relevant regulations on digital regulation. The Commission pointed out that TikTok did not do enough in disclosing relevant information about the release of video ads.

The European Commission investigated TikTok under the Digital Services Act (DSA), which requires platform operators to remove illegal content.

In order to prevent false information and fraudulent advertising, the EU Digital Services Act requires the disclosure of information about the source of advertising funds and also stipulates that the reasons for displaying specific ads should be disclosed to viewers. The European Commission believes that TikTok’s response is not sufficient.

In a statement on May 15, Virkkunen, the senior vice president of the European Commission for digital policy, emphasized that “transparency in advertising, including who pays and how to which audiences, is essential to protect the public interest.”

The European Commission is conducting multiple investigations into TikTok, suspecting that it has failed to take adequate measures to address risks that may affect the results of European elections and prevent minors from becoming addicted.

source: Apple JP

Apple iPhone high price crisis temporarily lifted

On May 29, the controversy over potential iPhone tariffs in the United States continued to ferment. Previously, Trump threatened to impose an additional 25% tariff on Apple. If this worst-case scenario comes true, the price of the most expensive model in the iPhone series may exceed $4,000.

However, the U.S. International Trade Court in New York ruled on the 28th that the Trump administration’s package tariff policy was illegal and ordered the revocation of its tariff measures promoted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

In just two months, the Trump administration announced tariffs on Chinese-made products, with the tax rate soaring from 10% to 145%. Although it later announced an exemption for consumer electronics, the exemption was a temporary measure. Since most of Apple’s products are produced in China, this may lead to a significant increase in its selling price in the United States.

Earlier this month, Trump escalated his threat again, planning to impose an additional 25% tariff on Apple alone, apparently in retaliation for Apple CEO Tim Cook’s refusal to participate in his trip to the Middle East. However, Trump later withdrew the tariff threat against Apple, saying it would also affect other companies.

According to CNET, the U.S. International Trade Court has now declared all previous executive orders issued by Trump invalid and ruled that the president has no power to impose tariffs – because only the U.S. Congress has the power to determine or adjust international trade tariffs.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. International Trade Court in New York unanimously agreed that Congress has exclusive power to regulate business with other countries, and that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, which Trump cited, does not give the president “unlimited” tariff-imposing power.

“The unlimited delegation of tariff power to another branch of the government would constitute an improper transfer of legislative power,” the court wrote in its ruling. “The relevant tariff executive orders will be lifted and the enforcement of these executive orders will be permanently prohibited.”

According to U.S. media reports, the White House must complete the process of suspending the tariff increase within 10 days. The Trump administration has appealed this.

source: Apple JP